Assistant Professor of Law
J.D., Yale Law School
Ph.D, Stanford University
M.A., University of British Columbia
B.A., University of Alberta
Professor Varsava’s research areas include civil procedure, courts and judicial decisionmaking, and ethics and professional responsibility in the legal and medical contexts. She employs both philosophical and empirical methods to study these areas.
Professor Varsava has published her research in law reviews and peer-reviewed journals, and has also published in non-academic venues such as SLATE and Colorado Lawyer. Her scholarship has been covered by media outlets such as the The New York Times and the American Bar Association Journal, and has been cited by both federal and state courts.
She has also co-written amicus briefs in cases concerning professional responsibility, and has advised clients on professional responsibility issues in legal practice, health care, and clinical research. Following law school, Professor Varsava served as a Judicial Law Clerk for the Supreme Court of Colorado.
In her spare time, Professor Varsava enjoys climbing rocks, cliffs, and walls.
Scholarship & Publications
- Legal Theory
- Procedural Justice
- Law and Language
- Judges and Courts
- Legal Ethics
- Bioethics and Health Law
Nina Varsava's article "The Role of Dissents in the Formation of Precedent" was cited by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana & Kentucky, Inc. The majority opinion grapples with the precedential effect of the Supreme Court's fractured abortion decision in June Medical.
Nina Varsava presented "Opinion Publication and Judge Gender at the Federal Courts of Appeals" at the Texas A&M Law School Faculty Workshop and the William & Mary Law School Faculty Workshop in January.
Nina Varsava presented “Opinion Publication and Judge Gender at the Federal Courts of Appeals” at the Computational Analysis of Law Workshop in January 2021.
Nina Varsava presented “Non-Consensual Warnings” as part of the New Voices in Law, Medicine and Healthcare series at the AALS Annual Meeting in January 2021.
Nina Varsava's article, "Precedent on Precedent," was published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online in November 2020.
Nina Varsava presented "Precedent, Interpretive Methodology and Conflicts of Law" to the Oxford Jurisprudence Discussion Group in October.
Nina Varsava presented “Opinion Publication and Judge Gender at the Federal Courts of Appeals” at the 2020 Chicagoland Junior Scholars Conference in October. She also presented the paper at online faculty workshops at Marquette University Law School and Denver University Sturm College of Law in September.
Nina Varsava presented “Judicial Opinions and Judge Gender on the Federal Courts of Appeals.” The talk was part of the 2020 online summer workshop series, hosted by Center for Empirical Research on the Legal Profession at University of California Irvine Law School.
Nina Varsava presented "Consent and the Duty to Return Results in Human Subjects Research" for the Virtual Health Law and Bioethics Workshop in July 2020.
Nina Varsava's article, "Allocating Authority between Lawyers and their Clients after McCoy v. Louisiana," was published in the Spring 2020 edition of New Criminal Law Review.
Nina Varsava presented "What Judicial Opinions can tell us about the Gender Roles and Biases of Judges" for the Law & Society Association Annual Meeting in May 2020. The paper presents empirical evidence of judge gender roles and biases on the federal courts of appeals.
Nina Varsava presented "Interjurisdictional Interpretation" at the Michigan Junior Scholars Conference, which was presented by the University of Michigan Law School in April 2020.
Nina Varsava's article, "Human Subjects Research Without Consent: Duties to Return Individual Findings When Participation was Non-Consensual," was published in The American Journal of Bioethics in January 2020.
Nina Varsava presented two talks at the 2020 AALS Annual Meeting, held in Washington, D.C., in January. For the Law as Data session, she presented "What Can Judicial Opinions (and Computational Legal Studies) Tell Us about the Gender Roles of Judges?," and for the Law and Interpretation session, she presented "Do Interpretive Rules 'Exceed the Limits of Stare Decisis?'"
News & Media
Thursday, Aug 12, 2021Nina Varsava discusses fractured Supreme Court opinions in light of Marks v. United States
Friday, Jul 23, 2021Forthcoming article by Nina Varsava reviewed
Thursday, Jul 1, 2021Nina Varsava discusses professional irresponsibility and judicial opinions
Friday, Jul 17, 2020Nina Varsava discusses her essay "Precedent on Precedent" and the Supreme Court ruling in Ramos v. Louisiana
Tuesday, Nov 26, 2019New faculty focus: Nina Varsava
Monday, Nov 18, 2019UW Law graduates, faculty receive Order of the Coif honors
Wednesday, Aug 14, 2019Professor Nina Varsava joins UW Law School faculty